Are the Producers of the US of A Play – Starting to Make Themselves Known

Can Billionaire Philanthropists Replace the Federal Government?

Some wealthy individuals are using the government shut-down to promote a very different vision for America’s future.

October 11, 2013


The US Treasury Department is closed as a result of the government shutdown. (AP aPhoto/Carolyn Kaster)

When the clock ran down on congressional negotiations and the federal government shut down on October 1, preschoolers across the country were locked out of their Head Start centers. But then, Laura and John Arnold, a billionaire couple from Houston, made a personal gift of $10 million to Head Start. The Arnolds, with an estimated net worth of $2.8 billion, amassed their fortune before either spouse turned 40, through careers in the oil industry, particularly John’s energy trading hedge fund, Centaurus Advisors.

Seal of the United States Department of the Tr...

Seal of the United States Department of the Treasury (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Ace News Group – Editorial:  

This is an excellent article from the Nation and brings me to the real players that people have heard me mention so many times, either in the form of the producers of the play, or those that manipulate the worlds resources. I do not mean the bankers or the oil men ,they are bad enough. These are the people who stand in the wings of the theatre  waiting for the final curtain of the US of A Plan, to fail! 

They have waited in the back ground just for the right time, when they can wield their power of money, this will not be the end, but the beginning of the end. This will be when all laws, rules and regulations can be changed, at the stroke of a pen and the almighty $!

This war will not be with weapons of mass destruction, even though these are bad enough for the those that are on the receiving end! This war will be fought out with who has the most money, power and control over the minions who do their bidding, for payment of course! These hidden people are given many names, from the Bildebergs, illuminati  with the real money such as controlled by their chosen few, these named the Rothschild’s or Rockefeller’s! Though the real identity of the controller’s is still unknown ,and will remain so until such time as the curtain of this US of A play finals falls, and the American Dream is finally over for the people who unknowingly were manipulated to the tune of the real producers, and eventually the writers of the script, that started in earnest after World War 2, and will end on floor of the senate very soon, but only when the controllers say so, and not a second before!                       

#acedebtnews, #acenewsservices, #aceworldnews, #10-million, #arnold, #bilderberg-group, #chemical-weapon, #government-shutdown, #head-start-program, #houston, #john-arnold, #john-d-arnold, #obama, #russia, #syria, #united-nations, #united-states

The Difference Between Profit and Prosperity Is Just One Word

I heard an amazing comment the other day from an investment broker dealing in the corporate bond market, that sums up this world into a cocked hat! It was we have always been able to borrow from the debt mountain for years, now suddenly it has become more difficult! Any country trading on debt will accumulate profit, but any country trading on providing for the peoples needs, will become prosperous! One word a different strategy, one is based on capitalism and the other is based on sharing of the countries wealth!

#acenewsservices, #newsandviews-debt, #bond-market, #broker, #corporate, #profit, #prosperous, #wealth

Sell-Out of Tax Payers – As Sell-Off of Lloyds Bank – To Large Investors – Takes Place

English: Study on alternative investments by i...

English: Study on alternative investments by institutional investors. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Government sells 6 per cent of shares in Lloyds Banking Group, at 75p per share.

The government has today begun the process of selling part of its shares in Lloyd’s Banking Group. It has sold 6 per cent of the shares in the bank, at a price of 75p per share. A profit has been made from the sale, which will be used to pay down the national debt.

The Chancellor received advice from UK Financial Investments yesterday that it would be appropriate to begin the process to sell part of the government’s shareholding in Lloyd’s. The Chancellor agreed with that advice and authorised the process to begin.

Today marks an important step in the government’s plan for the recovery of Britain’s banking system.

The Chancellor, George Osborne, said:

I can confirm this morning that we have sold 6% of Lloyd’s Bank at 75p a share. That is a profit for taxpayers, and rightly so. The money will be used to reduce the national debt by over half a billion pounds.

This is another step in the long journey in putting right what went so badly wrong in the British economy; it’s another step in repairing the banks; it’s another step in getting the money back for the taxpayer; and it’s another step in reducing our national debt.

All of those things together are good news.

If you look at what has happened over the last 12 hours with Lloyd’s, you have investors from around the world investing in a British bank. That is a sign the British economy is turning a corner.

On the face of it this looks good for the tax payer  and couched in the correct way such as the return and the overall benefits, we could start to believe this government really cares about the use of tax payers money! The fact is look much deeper at the way it has been worded by our Chancellor and look at who will benefit and a very different story emerges! The actual shares are to be sold off or should l say offered to:

 Institutional investors are organizations which pool large sums of money and invest those sums in securitiesreal property and other investment assets. They can also include operating companies which decide to invest their profits to some degree in these types of assets.

Typical investors include banks, insurance companies, retirement or pension fundshedge fundsinvestment advisors and mutual funds. Their role in the economy is to act as highly specialized investors on behalf of others. For instance, an ordinary person will have a pension from his employer. The employer gives that person’s pension contributions to a fund. The fund will buy shares in a company, or some other financial product. Funds are useful because they will hold a broad portfolio of investments in many companies. This spreads risk, so if one company fails, it will be only a small part of the whole fund’s investment.

Institutional investors will have a lot of influence in the management of corporations because they will be entitled to exercise the voting rights in a company. They can actively engage in corporate governance. Furthermore, because institutional investors have the freedom to buy and sell shares, they can play a large part in which companies stay solvent, and which go under. Influencing the conduct of listed companies, and providing them with capital are all part of the job of investment management.

This will of course look to bolster the economy for the institutions and at the same time make the pension funds look more healthy for the beleaguered OAPS investments, which of course were decimated back in 2008, at the time of the financial crisis, brought on mainly by the banks and their risky lending policy, something that our previous Bank of England Manager would not sanction, but enter Osborne’s new replacement and all of a sudden, risky lending is back on the cards! Anyone uncertain of Mr Carney’s track record for taking risks read his policy in the Canadian Banking Industry and see what l mean!

So now we have what l can only term as a sell-out of the tax payer, having bolstered up the banks with the hard-earned tax payers funds, using infrastructure funds ,that should light our streets or renew our roads, and now the 4 year plan is completed! Oh yes also a split between the savings and retail arms of what was Lloyd’s TSB Bank Plc and now we have to distinct banks Lloyd’s Bank PLC and TSB Bank PLC, has also taken place, allowing any toxic assets to disappear, into the restructuring process!

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240104/Chancellor_letter.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240105/UKFI_letter.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240106/Perm_sec.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240104/Chancellor_letter.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240105/UKFI_letter.pdf

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/240106/Perm_sec.pdf

UK Financial Investments:

Take a look at their site and view their pdf containing details of the sell-off you even have to agree not to use the information in the US, but visit here is a link to their site: http://www.ukfi.co.uk/

#acenewsservices, #sellout, #business, #economy, #economy-of-the-united-kingdom, #george-osborne, #government, #lloyds, #lloyds-bank, #lloyds-banking-group, #mutual-fund, #politics, #the-survivors-of-the-chancellor, #uk-financial-investments-limited

California Oil Soars on Middle Eastern Conflicts

The reason why Syria could be the best thing that happens to the US and how the oily-garchs will benefit, also protect Saudi Arabia and secure your future, dam the people dying! You do not need to look any further than this saying:

When the Lamb opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, "Come and see!" I looked, and there before me was a black horse! Its rider was holding a pair of scales in his hand. Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, "A quart of wheat for a day’s wages, and three quarts of barley for a day’s wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!"

Revelation 6:5-6˄ NIV

#acenewsservices, #peace, #california, #oil, #revelations, #syria

CNR net Beijing on September 10 message according…

CNR net Beijing on September 10 message, according to Voice of China “News” reported that “the Chinese government’s response to hefty fines, GSK may withdraw from China.”
  Media reports said the British pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline executives said GSK executives in China are involved in economic crime investigation, the company faces a hefty fine of up to 20 billion yuan and an increasingly difficult business in China, Gülen Su GSK is considering to withdraw from China. But this morning the British media also reported that GSK denied previous reports.
  Aspect Comment: left, 20 billion fine captive; away, a huge asset difficult discarded. True to exit or create a gimmick, GlaxoSmithKline snake oil medicine has long been exposed. Market never believe in tears, a crying two busy three hanging unworkable before the law, foreign companies have no privileges. We advise one, illegality must be punished, truly repentant to re-start.
http://news.china.com.cn/live/2013-09/10/content_22256753.htm

#acenewsservices, #beijing, #glaxo-smith-kline, #voice-of-china

News story: Deputy Prime Minister meeting with President Abbas

#syria and #peace

 

Inside GovernmentNews story: Deputy Prime Minister meeting with President Abbas
English: United Kingdom's Deputy Prime Minster...

English: United Kingdom’s Deputy Prime Minster and Lord President of the Council Nick Clegg. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

11 September, 2013 at 04:31pm

Nick Clegg met Palestinian President Abbas to discuss the Syria crisis and progress on the Middle East peace process. today!

They also discussed their shared concern at the impact of the Syrian conflict on Palestinian refugees, their abhorrence at the use of chemical weapons and their wish for progress towards a political solution to the conflict.

The Deputy Prime Minister said:

I was delighted to see President Abbas in London today. During our meeting I underlined to President Abbas the UK’s support for the courageous and decisive leadership he has shown, together with Prime Minister Netanyahu, by returning to talks on the Middle East Peace Process. I also paid tribute to President Abbas’ deeply-held commitment to peace.

 

 

#acenewsservices, #abbas, #london, #mahmoud-abbas, #middle-east, #nick-clegg, #peace-process-in-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict, #president-of-the-palestinian-national-authority

The Miranda Warning – is this a – Real Wake up Call – to our Future

Great Seal Bug from NSA archives

Great Seal Bug from NSA archives (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This article was published a few days ago by News Press and relates to events that have now taken a step further in relation to reason for the arrest! So whether we believe it or not, what seems very evident from studies l have undertaken, is the future is more like ” big brother is watching you” than we ever imagined possible!    

The exert below copied and pasted from the article, which is excellent and well worth a read:

Over the past decade, the United States has stretched the definition of( “terrorism” )

to justify or disguise expansions of surveillance and war. In 2003,

President Bush declared that overthrowing Arab dictators was part of the

“war on terror.” From 2004 to 2007, the Bush administration persuaded

the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to define massive,

overwhelmingly innocent clusters of communications data as

terrorism-related “facilities” subject to authorized U.S. surveillance.

In 2009, U.S. officials labelled the Fort Hood shooter a “terrorist” for

killing fellow U.S. military personnel. In 2010, the CIA designated the

fatal bombing of its drone-war operators in Afghanistan as a “terrorist

attack.”

So my reading of just this particular extract allows me to see deeper into people’s minds, and see why when they are polled independently, that up to 60% said it was a necessary evil, the question is who is the real evil in reality,  the protectionism ,or the terrorism! So this led me to write about ” How l can see Times are a Changing” and the liberty and justice that the people of the US and our country, once enjoyed so freely, will soon be all but eroded!  All in the name of ” NEW ” – Liberty and Justice – same as before but this time very, very different!  No longer the right to speak out about your government, as this is called “treason” once was called “Free Speech” or just mention a certain government body like the NSA or CIA and you instantly become a sympathiser, once you were a libertarian!  You get my drift!

Well the Miranda Warning is just that a friend of the editor of a UK news paper was targeted for one reason and one reason only, that was first the whereabouts of Edward Snowden and secondly what was on his laptop! Someone, maybe a whistle-blower told some high-ranking official in security that it may be worth stopping this person on this day!

Well of course to even the most ardent investigator this can not easily be proved, but as all journalists know providing the facts behind the story is all about honesty and not speculation, but in the case of David Miranda, he was arrested on the pretence of being a terrorist, not that he just happened to be a close friend and confidant of the Guardian reporter who first released the Edward Snowden story! Or that sometime later the same UK reporter had his offices investigated and his laptop was also searched!

No this was just to protect the US and UK people and the “Land of the Free” also stated many times by politicians alike as a country of “Free Speech” maybe l should have called this article another name like “When is free speech really Free” of course it would not have had the same impact as the mere mention of the name Miranda, but my reason for calling it, by the excellent article writer William Saletan was simply, it is a warning to people of what is to come, as nobody did anything to stop this “Terrorist Act” being written, and legislated and now, as we have seen put into action! So it is a Warning in my personal opinion a dire warning of control by new and more stringent laws, brought about by the people themselves, asking for more protection measures!

Always remember every country is judged on the fairness of its laws, not the harshness by the way they are laid down!

So this today with the ever-changing political landscape, of change for change sake happening daily, spare a thought for those that through no fault of their own have and will become a scapegoat of a system, that was designed by people who convinced the people, that what we are doing for you, is providing a way to protect you from the evil doers.

My last question is who really are these evil doers?        

The Miranda Warning. Please read and comment as it is you the people that change the world, either for the good or for yourselves! 

 

#acenewsservices, #snowden, #definition-of-terrorism, #edward-snowden, #george-w-bush, #intelligence-surveillance, #miranda, #miranda-warning, #real-evil, #terrorism, #united-states, #united-states-foreign-intelligence-surveillance-court, #william-saletan

Hidden tax on older – Care Home Residents – that councils rely upon

Care In The CommunityAccording  to a press release by Laing and Buisson in January 2013

Councils rely on a ‘hidden tax’ on older care home residents

Data presented in the latest edition of the Care of Elderly People UK Market Survey 2012-13* shows that 175,000 older residents (43.4%) paid the full costs of their long-term care fees in 2012. A further 56,000 (14%), while being supported by councils, also relied on ‘top-ups’ from family or friends. This means that a total of 231,000 older residents were paying in full or in part from their own or their families’ resources – this marks a record high of 57% of all (403,000) older residents of independent sector care homes in the UK.

The remaining 43% of residents either had their fees paid in full by councils (143,000) or by the NHS under the continuing healthcare programme (29,000).

Commenting on the findings, author and Laing & Buisson chief executive William Laing predicted a further shift to private pay in the future.

Mr Laing said:

‘The private payers’ share is projected to continue growing in the future as the rate of owner occupation continues to expand among the very old population at risk of entering care homes. Meanwhile, the quasi-private, top-up market will be reinforced by the minimal or zero local authority fee uplifts which look likely to continue in the medium term.’

There is, of course, wide regional variation with a much higher proportion of ‘pure’ private payers in affluent areas of the country including the South East (55% of residents), South West (53%) and East of England 50%). The North East, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, meanwhile, have the lowest level at just 22%, compared with the UK average of 43%.

What’s more, with the per week fees being paid by councils either frozen or subject to very minor uplifts, the gap between what councils pay and what private payers are being asked to pay is opening up to an alarming extent.

On average, according to the report, English councils are paying just £480 per week for residential care in 2012/13, approximately £50 – £140 less than the ‘fair market price’ range of £528 – £623 calculated by Laing & Buisson (with nursing care fees being about £150 per week higher).

‘The private payers’ share is projected to continue growing in the future as the rate of owner occupation continues to expand among the very old population at risk of entering care homes. Meanwhile, the quasi-private, top-up market will be reinforced by the minimal or zero local authority fee uplifts which look likely to continue in the medium term.’

There is, of course, wide regional variation with a much higher proportion of ‘pure’ private payers in affluent areas of the country including the South East (55% of residents), South West (53%) and East of England 50%). The North East, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, meanwhile, have the lowest level at just 22%, compared with the UK average of 43%.

What’s more, with the per week fees being paid by councils either frozen or subject to very minor uplifts, the gap between what councils pay and what private payers are being asked to pay is opening up to an alarming extent.

On average, according to the report, English councils are paying just £480 per week for residential care in 2012/13, approximately £50 – £140 less than the ‘fair market price’ range of £528 – £623 calculated by Laing & Buisson (with nursing care fees being about £150 per week higher).

Mr Laing commented:

‘The reality is that independent care home providers are having to rely more and more on cross subsidies from private payers. Without these subsidies, large numbers of care homes would be literally bust. It is understandable that cash-strapped councils are seeking to pay care homes as little as they can, since this is now the biggest single cost that councils have to bear, but it needs to be recognised that this amounts to a ‘hidden tax’ on private payers, who are in effect bearing the brunt of austerity measures.’

Addressing the long-term funding debate, the report says that implementation of the Dilnot proposals would certainly reduce the burden on private payers and their families, but it will by no means remove it, because the proposal is that only ‘care’ costs will be paid by the state once an (as yet undecided) cap is reached, leaving the individual to pay for ‘hotel’ and other costs which are included in care home fees.

For the first time, Laing & Buisson has split care home costs into their component parts (see table below) for a care home meeting all the latest physical and other standards:

‘The private payers’ share is projected to continue growing in the future as the rate of owner occupation continues to expand among the very old population at risk of entering care homes. Meanwhile, the quasi-private, top-up market will be reinforced by the minimal or zero local authority fee uplifts which look likely to continue in the medium term.’

There is, of course, wide regional variation with a much higher proportion of ‘pure’ private payers in affluent areas of the country including the South East (55% of residents), South West (53%) and East of England 50%). The North East, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man, meanwhile, have the lowest level at just 22%, compared with the UK average of 43%.

What’s more, with the per week fees being paid by councils either frozen or subject to very minor uplifts, the gap between what councils pay and what private payers are being asked to pay is opening up to an alarming extent.

On average, according to the report, English councils are paying just £480 per week for residential care in 2012/13, approximately £50 – £140 less than the ‘fair market price’ range of £528 – £623 calculated by Laing & Buisson (with nursing care fees being about £150 per week higher).

Mr Laing commented:

‘The reality is that independent care home providers are having to rely more and more on cross subsidies from private payers. Without these subsidies, large numbers of care homes would be literally bust. It is understandable that cash-strapped councils are seeking to pay care homes as little as they can, since this is now the biggest single cost that councils have to bear, but it needs to be recognised that this amounts to a ‘hidden tax’ on private payers, who are in effect bearing the brunt of austerity measures.’

Addressing the long-term funding debate, the report says that implementation of the Dilnot proposals would certainly reduce the burden on private payers and their families, but it will by no means remove it, because the proposal is that only ‘care’ costs will be paid by the state once an (as yet undecided) cap is reached, leaving the individual to pay for ‘hotel’ and other costs which are included in care home fees.

For the first time, Laing & Buisson has split care home costs into their component parts (see table below) for a care home meeting all the latest physical and other standards:

Table. Breakdown of care home fees £ per resident per week, England average

 Care Costs
 Accommodation Costs
Ancillary Costs
 Operator’s Profit  Total Costs and Profit
Residential care
frail elderly
 £197 £151 £205 £44 £596
Nursing care
frail elderly
 £347 £153 £205 £59 £764
Residential care
dementia
 £221 £151 £205 £47 £623
Nursing care
dementia
 £356  £153 £205 £60 £774

On these figures, residents and their families would under the Dilnot proposals still have to pay £399 – £418 per week in care home fees on average, even after the state picks up the full cost of ‘care’. And in affluent parts of the country the costs to the individual will much higher. It would still be necessary post-Dilnot, therefore, for most private payers entering care homes to sell any house they own to pay for fees – either at the outset, or at death for those benefiting from deferred payment arrangements.

There are also hidden dangers from Dilnot for care home operators, according to the report. In particular, moving the upper limit of the asset threshold from £23,250 to £100,000 would mean that large numbers of care home residents who are presently private payers would be drawn within the ambit of local authority payment, meaning that a significant proportion of the premium fee rates which are presently needed to cross subsidise inadequate local authority fee rates may gravitate towards the low fee regime of councils.

Looking at the financial health of care home operators, and with one eye on government proposals to instigate some form of financial regulation on the largest corporate providers, the report highlights the very different fortunes of providers across the ‘north/south’ or ‘affluent/non-affluent’ divide. Those facing the toughest market, and bearing the brunt of council expenditure cuts, are operators with large slices of their care home portfolio in the North and the Midlands. Providers with a portfolio concentrated in more affluent areas are performing comparatively well, subject to the debt overhangs from pre-crisis days that still affect some healthcare providers.

Mr Laing added:

‘Market polarisation means that three of the four largest groups, including the market leader Four Seasons Health Care, are becoming increasingly unrepresentative of the market as a whole – and this is reflected in operating margins. Four Seasons, Bupa Care Homes and HC-One all have significantly higher than average exposure to publicly paid residents, and each has reported a significant decline in EBITDAR as a percentage of revenue since the austerity measures began. Meanwhile, the operating profitability of private-pay focused Barchester Healthcare remained above 30%. The 2012 results of the largest groups will be awaited with great interest.’

Elsewhere the report once again shows that, despite public policy which seeks to divert elderly care away from residential settings, the overall number of people being supported in their older age in care homes is on the up. In 2012 there were 432,000 older or physically people in all residential settings (independent and public supply combined), compared to 422,000 in the previous year, representing growth of 2.2%.

This fuelled an occupancy rate growth in the year taking it to an average 89.9% in 2012, compared to 88.5% in 2011.

Of the total capacity of 487,800 care beds currently operating in the country, those owned and run by the state dropped by a further 11% in the year to 38,800. Independent providers took advantage of this fall, adding 8,300 beds to its market share (now at 449,000).

Mr Laing concluded:

‘A two decade declining trend in the volume of demand appears to have been transformed into a rising trend. Independent sector capacity from new registrations continues to run at about double the loss of capacity from closures, making this unexpected surge one of the most significant trends to emerge from recent marketing monitoring. Without rising demand the additional capacity would impact negatively on occupancy rates and profitability at a time when the sector is also being challenged by council finding. However, this had not happened and new capacity has been coming onto the market at a faster rate over the last four years and there is no sign of this falling off so far in 2013.’

  • END OF RELEASE

Care of Elderly People UK 2012/13 – Key facts:

Care Homes

  • At September 2012 care home capacity in the UK stood at 487,800 places in residential settings for long stay care of elderly and physically disabled people across all sectors (independent and public) – up 3,600 places over April 2011.
  • Of this, 432,000 places were occupied in April 2011, up 10,000 over April 2011.
  • The estimated annual value of the market is £15.2bn (2011: £14.6bn). This breaks down as: for-profit sector – £11.1bn (2011: £10.5bn); voluntary sector – £2.2bn (2001: £2bn); public sector – £1.9bn (2001: £2bn).
  • Average care home fees across the UK for the financial year 2012/13 are ££731 (2011/12: £722) per week for nursing care and £531 (2011/12: £542) per week for residential care.

Non-residential care services

  • Public and private spending on non-residential social care and community health services for elderly and physically disabled people is estimated at £7.4bn in England (2011: £7.7bn). Of this, £4bn was spent by English local authorities on services, of which 60% were provided by the independent sector. A further £2.6bn was spent by the NHS on almost exclusively in-house services such as district and community nurses. Private spending accounted for an estimated £1.2bn on home care services. A further £500m was spent via Direct Payments.
  • Hours of homecare commissioned from the independent sector dropped from 175m to 168m in the year to March 2012 with council-supplied hours falling from 26m to 20m.

*Care of Elderly People UK Market Survey 2012/13. Priced at £835 for hard copy and £1,195 for hard copy and PDF. Available from Laing & Buisson, 29 Angel Gate, City Road, London, EC1V 2PT. Tel: 020 7833 9123. Web: www.laingbuisson.co.uk

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

William Laing Justin Merritt
Laing & Buisson Laing & Buisson
Chief Executive Operations Director
Tel: 020 7923 5347 Tel: 0207 841 0049
william@laingbuisson.co.uk justin@laingbuisson.co.uk

#acenewsservices, #austeritymeasures, #england, #home-care, #isle-of-man, #nhs, #northern-ireland, #nursing, #nursing-home, #residential-care

Bildebergs Rise And Rise From Obscurity

The fact that Bildeberg and all it now stands for began in 1954 with two well-known names at his head table namely Royal Dutch Petroleum and Queen Beatrix and proceeded to a point when in 2013, none other than our chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne attended, then it is beginning to achieve what it began so long ago! Namely control of the people by the economic means, will shortly reach its ultimate conclusion!

The Davignon Report that was published on 27 October 1970, was a report on the future foreign policy of European Economic Community member nations. It was written by a council chaired by Étienne Davignon of the Belgian Foreign Office. The committee was appointed by the Council of the European Communities to make proposals on political cooperation between the member states.  It recommended that member states should try to speak with a single voice on international problems, a proposal that was approved by all six member governments. It resulted first in European Political Cooperation and later in the European Union‘s Common Foreign and Security Policy in 1992.  Étienne Francois Jacques Davignon, Viscount Davignon (born 4 October 1932 in Budapest) is a Belgian politician, businessman, and former vice-president of the European Commission. He also was a member of the first steering committee, which eventually would have such people as in 2013 known other than Kenneth Clark ex Chancellor of this present UK government.

The funding of such an organisation would eventually become a lot easier with such people who were regularly invited, providing donations. One of the first was to Rockefeller and he was instantly classed as a honoury member, with other such prominent leaders as Henry Kissinger and Pinochet! The main family that l mentioned earlier was the Rothschild’s and they would provide a way forward, with what would eventually become known as “Club Bildeberg” with each additional member representing a particular area of the economic globe! This may be either oil, news, finance, media, etc eventually leading to an annual conference in some part of the world, always behind close doors and nobody knowing what they are really discussing, or planning!

Useful links:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilderberg_Group

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants

Related articles

 

#acenewsservices, #etienne-davignon, #bilderberg-group, #common-foreign-and-security-policy, #council-of-the-european-union, #davignon-report, #european-commission, #european-economic-community, #european-political-cooperation, #european-union, #first-steering-committee, #former-vice-president, #henry-kissinger, #honoury-member, #queen-beatrix, #royal-dutch-petroleum

Tavistock: The Best Kept Secret in America

Formed in 1947, the Tavistock Institute is an independent not-for-profit organization which seeks to combine research in the social sciences with professional practice. Problems of institution-building and organizational design and change are being tackled in all sectors – government, industry and commerce, health and welfare, education, etc. – nationally and internationally, and clients range from multinationals to small community groups. A growth area has been the use of a developmental approach to evaluation of new and experimental programs, particularly in health, education and community development. This has also produced new training events alongside the regular program of group relations conferences. The Institute owns and edits the monthly journal Human Relations (published by Plenum Press) which is now in its 48th year, and has recently launched (in conjunction with Sage Publications) a new journal Evaluation.

Three elements combine to make the Institute unusual, if not unique: it has the independence of being entirely self-financing, with no subsidies from the government or other sources; the action research orientation places it between, but not in, the worlds of academia and consultancy; and its range of disciplines include anthropology, economics, organizational behavior, political science, psychoanalysis, psychology and sociology.

The ideology of American foundations was created by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. In 1921, the Duke of Bedford, Marquess of Tavistock, the 11th Duke, gave a building to the Institute to study the effect of shellshock on British soldiers who survived World War I. Its purpose was to establish the “breaking point” of men under stress, under the direction of the British Army Bureau of Psychological Warfare, commanded by Sir John Rawlings-Reese.

Tavistock Institute is headquartered in London. Its prophet, Sigmond Freud, settled in Maresfield Gardens when he moved to England. He was given a mansion by Princess Bonaparte. Tavistock’s pioneer work in behavioral science along Freudian lines of “controlling” humans established it as the world center of foundation ideology. Its network now extends from the University of Sussex to the U.S. through the Stanford Research Institute, Esalen, MIT, <http://watch.pair.com/Hudson.html>Hudson Institute, <http://watch.pair.com/heritage.html>Heritage Foundation, Center of Strategic and International Studies at Georgetown, where State Dept. personal are trained, US Air Force Intelligence, and the Rand and Mitre corporations. The personnel of the corporations are required to undergo indoctrination at one or more of these Tavistock controlled institutions. A network of secret groups, the Mont Pelerin Society, Trilateral Commission, Ditchley Foundation, and the Club of Rome is conduit for instructions to the Tavistock network.

Tavistock Institute developed the mass brain-washing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a “refugee”, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II.

In 1938, Roosevelt executed a secret agreement with Churchill which in effect ceded U.S. sovereignty to England, because it agreed to let Special Operations Executive control U.S. policies. To implement this agreement, Roosevelt sent General Donovan to London for indoctrination before setting up OSS (now the CIA) under the aegis of SOE-SIS. The entire OSS program, as well as the CIA has always worked on guidelines set up by the Tavistock Institute.

Tavistock Institute originated the mass civilian bombing raids carried out by Roosevelt and Churchill purely as a clinical experiment in mass terror, keeping records of the results as they watched the “guinea pigs” reacting under “controlled laboratory conditions”. All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal—to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break down the family unit, and family inculcated principles of religion, honor, patriotism and sexual behavior, is used by the Tavistock scientists as weapons of crowd control.

The methods of Freudian psychotherapy induce permanent mental illness in those who undergo this treatment by destabilizing their character. The victim is then advised to “establish new rituals of personal interaction”, that is, to indulge in brief sexual encounters which actually set the participants adrift with no stable personal relationships in their lives, destroying their ability to establish or maintain a family. Tavistock Institute has developed such power in the U.S. that no one achieves prominence in any field unless he has been trained in behavioral science at Tavistock or one of its subsidiaries.

Henry Kissinger, whose meteoric rise to power is otherwise inexplicable, was a German refugee and student of Sir John Rawlings-Reese at SHAEF. Dr. Peter Bourne, a Tavistock Institute psychologist, picked Jimmy Carter for President of the U.S. solely because Carter had undergone an intensive brainwashing program administered by Admiral Hyman Rickover at Annapolis. The “experiment” in compulsory racial integration in the U.S. was organized by Ronald Lippert, of the OSS and the American Jewish Congress, and director of child training at the Commission on Community Relations. The program was designed to break down the individual’s sense of personal knowledge in his identity, his racial heritage. Through the Stanford Research Institute, Tavistock controls the National Education Association. The Institute of Social Research at the National Training Lab brain washes the leading executives of business and government.

Such is the power of Tavistock that our entire space program was scrapped for nine years so that the Soviets could catch up. The hiatus was demanded in an article written by Dr. Anatol Rapport, and was promptly granted by the government, to the complete mystification of everyone connected with NASA. Another prominent Tavistock operation is the Wharton School of Finance, at the University of Pennsylvania. A single common denominator identifies the common Tavistock strategy—the use of drugs. The infamous MK Ultra program of the CIA, in which unsuspecting CIA officials were given LSD, and their reaction studied like “guinea pigs”, resulted in several deaths.

The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid [LSD]. Roosevelt’s advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html#ips>Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD “counter-culture” of the 1960s, the “student revolution”, which was financed by $25 million from the CIA.

One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association, and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments.

The U.S. Government had to pay millions in damages to the families of the victims, but the culprits were never indicted. The program originated when Sandoz AG, a Swiss drug firm, owned by S.G. Warburg Co. of London, developed Lysergic Acid [LSD]. Roosevelt’s advisor, James Paul Warburg, son of Paul Warburg who wrote the Federal Reserve Act, and nephew of Max Warburg who had financed Hitler, set up the <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html#ips>Institute for Policy Studies to promote the drug. The result was the LSD “counter-culture” of the 1960s, the “student revolution”, which was financed by $25 million from the CIA.

One part of MK Ultra was the Human Ecology Fund; the CIA also paid Dr. Herbert Kelman of Harvard to carry out further experiments on mind control. In the 1950s, the CIA financed extensive LSD experiments in Canada. Dr. D. Ewen Cameron, president of the Canadian Psychological Association, and director of Royal Victorian Hospital, Montreal, received large payments from the CIA to give 53 patients large doses of LSD and record their reactions; the patients were drugged into weeks of sleep and then given electric shock treatments.

Today the Tavistock Institute operates a $6 Billion a year network of Foundations in the U.S., all of it funded by U.S. taxpayers’ money. Ten major institutions are under its direct control, with 400 subsidiaries, and 3000 other study groups and think tanks which originate many types of programs to increase the control of the World Order over the American people. The Stanford Research Institute, adjoining the Hoover Institution, is a $150 million a year operation with 3300 employees. It carries on program surveillance for Bechtel, Kaiser, and 400 other companies, and extensive intelligence operations for the CIA. It is the largest institution on the West Coast promoting mind control and the behavioral sciences.

One of the key agencies as a conduit for secret instructions from Tavistock is the Ditchley Foundation, founded in 1957. The American branch of the Ditchley Foundation is run by Cyrus Vance, former Secretary of State, and director of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Winston Lord, president of the Council on Foreign Relations.

[Editor, Tim Aho’s note: The wife of Winston Lord (CFR, Bilderberg, Skull & Bones), Bette Bao Lord (CFR, Bilderberg), is Chairman of the Board of Freedom House whose manipulation of the Christian Right via the Religious Persecution issue is documented in our report <http://watch.pair.com/FreedomHouse.html>Freedom House: A CFR Front.]

One of the principal but little known operations of the Rockefeller Foundation has been its techniques for controlling world agriculture. Its director, Kenneth Wernimont, set up Rockefeller controlled agricultural programs throughout Mexico and Latin America. The independent farmer is a great threat to the World Order, because he produces for himself, and because his produce can be converted into capital, which gives him independence. In Soviet Russia, the Bolsheviks believed they had attained total control over the people; they were dismayed to find their plans threatened by the stubborn independence of the small farmers, the Kulaks.

Stalin ordered the OGPU to seize all food and animals of the Kulaks, and to starve them out. The Chicago American, February 25, 1935 carried a front page headline, SIX MILLION PERISH IN SOVIET FAMINE; Peasants’ Crops Seized, They and their Animals Starve. To draw attention from this atrocity, it was later alleged that the Germans, not the Soviets, had killed six million people, the number taken from the Chicago American headline by a Chicago publicist.

The Communist Party, the Party of the Peasants and Workers, exterminated the peasants and enslaved the workers. Many totalitarian regimes have found the small farmer to be their biggest stumbling block. The French Reign of Terror was directed, not against the aristocrats, many of whom were sympathetic to it, but against the small farmers who refused to turn over their grain to the revolutionary tribunals in exchange for the worthless assignats. In the United States, the foundations are presently engaged in the same type of war of extermination against the American farmer.

The traditional formula of land plus labor for the farmer has been altered due to the farmer’s need for purchasing power, to buy industrial goods needed in his farming operations. Because of this need for capital, the farmer is especially vulnerable to the World Order’s manipulation of interest rates, which is bankrupting him. Just as in the Soviet Union, in the early 1930s, when Stalin ordered the Kulaks to give up their small plots of land to live and work on the collective farms, the American small farmer faces the same type of extermination, being forced to give up his small plot of land to become a hired hand for the big agricultural trusts. The Brookings Institution and other foundations originated the monetary programs implemented by the Federal Reserve System to destroy the American farmer, a replay of the Soviet tragedy in Russia, with one proviso that the farmer will be allowed to survive if he becomes a slave worker of the giant trusts.

Once the citizen becomes aware of the true role of the foundations, he can understand the high interest rates, high taxes, the destruction of the family, the degradation of the churches into forums for revolution, the subversion of the universities into CIA cesspools of drug addiction, and the halls of government into sewers of international espionage and intrigue. The American citizen can now understand why every agent of the federal government is against him; the alphabet agencies, the FBI, IRS, CIA and BATF must make war on the citizen in order to carry out the programs of the foundations.

The foundations are in direct violation of their charters, which commit them to do “charitable” work, because they make no grants which are not part of a political goal. The charge has been made, and never denied, that the Heritage-AEI network has at least two KGB moles on its staff. The employment of professional intelligence operatives as “charitable” workers, as was done in the Red Cross Mission to Russia in 1917, exposes the sinister political economic and social goals which the World Order requires the foundations to achieve through their ” bequests “.

Not only is this tax fraud, because the foundations are granted tax exemption solely to do charitable work, but it is criminal syndicalism, conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States of America, Constitutional Law 213, Corpus Juris Secundum 16. For the first time, the close interlocking of the foundation “syndicate” has been revealed by the names of its principle incorporators—Daniel Coit Gilman, who incorporated the Peabody Fund and the John Slater Fund, and became an incorporator of the General Education Board (now the Rockefeller Foundation); Gilman, who also incorporated the Russell Trust in 1856, later became an incorporator of the Carnegie Institution with Andrew Dickson White (Russell Trust) and Frederic A. Delano. Delano also was an original incorporator of the Brookings Institution and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Daniel Coit Gilman incorporated the Russell Sage Foundation with Cleveland H. Dodge of the National City Bank. These foundations incorporators have been closely linked with the Federal Reserve System, the War Industries Board of World War I, the OSS of World War II and the CIA. They have also been closely linked with the American International Corporation, which was formed to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Delano, an uncle of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was on the original Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 1914. His brother-in-law founded the influential Washington law firm of Covington and Burling. The Delanos and other ruling families of the World Order trace their lineage directly back to William of Orange and the regime which granted the charter of the Bank of England.

#acenewsservices, #climate, #duke-of-bedford, #england, #hudson-institute, #libya, #london, #politics, #research, #science, #sri-international, #tavistock, #tavistock-institute, #tavistock-institute-of-human-relations, #united-states